Skip to content
Back to insights
Reports Published November 5, 2025 4 min read

Gift vs inheritance of a company: tax implications

The transfer of a family business can be carried out through a lifetime gift or through inheritance. Each route has radically different tax implications depending on the autonomous community, the corporate structure, and compliance with specific requirements.

BM

Blue Mountain Capital

Blue Mountain Capital

Share
Blue Mountain Capital | | 4 min read

The transfer of a family business to the next generation is one of the most consequential decisions an entrepreneur will face. Beyond the emotional and operational dimensions, the tax implications of this transfer can represent hundreds of thousands — or millions — of euros in difference, depending on whether the transfer is structured as a lifetime gift (donacion inter vivos) or a transfer on death (sucesion mortis causa).

The fundamental choice

Spanish law offers two primary routes for transferring a family business to the next generation:

Lifetime gift (donacion). The owner transfers the company (or shares in it) to the next generation during their lifetime. The transfer is subject to Gift Tax (Impuesto sobre Donaciones), with rates and exemptions that vary significantly by autonomous community.

Inheritance (herencia). The company passes to the next generation upon the owner’s death. The transfer is subject to Inheritance Tax (Impuesto sobre Sucesiones), again with significant regional variations.

Both routes can benefit from the 95% reduction in the taxable base for family business transfers — one of the most powerful tax incentives in the Spanish system — but the requirements and conditions differ.

The 95% reduction: requirements

Article 20.2.c) of the Inheritance and Gift Tax Act provides for a 95% reduction in the taxable base for transfers of family business shares, provided certain conditions are met:

Wealth Tax exemption. The shares must be exempt from Wealth Tax under article 4.8 of the Wealth Tax Act. This requires that the company carries out a genuine economic activity (not merely holding assets), that the transferor (or their family group) holds at least 20% of the company, and that at least one family member exercises management functions and receives more than 50% of their employment/professional income from the company.

Maintenance obligation. The recipient must maintain the shares and the right to the exemption for a specified period — typically five years for inheritance and, in most regions, the same for gifts.

Gift: advantages and risks

Advantages. The transferor retains control over timing and can structure the transfer gradually. Tax planning can be optimised because the transfer is deliberate rather than reactive. The transferor can observe how the next generation manages the business and make adjustments if necessary.

Risks. Not all autonomous communities offer the same reductions for gifts as for inheritance. In some regions, the tax bill for a gift can be significantly higher. Additionally, a lifetime gift is irrevocable — once the shares are transferred, the owner cannot take them back.

Inheritance: advantages and risks

Advantages. The 95% reduction is available in all autonomous communities for inheritance. The transfer occurs at the moment of death, which means the owner retains full control until then. In many regions, inheritance between parents and children benefits from additional reductions or near-zero effective rates.

Risks. The timing is unpredictable. An unexpected death without proper succession planning can trigger a chaotic transfer with adverse tax consequences. The company may suffer during the transition period if no succession plan is in place.

Regional variations

The tax landscape for family business transfers varies dramatically across Spain’s autonomous communities. Some regions — notably Madrid, Andalusia, and the Valencian Community — have effectively reduced inheritance tax between close relatives to near zero. Others maintain higher rates but offer specific incentives for business transfers.

This regional variation means that the optimal transfer strategy depends not only on the family’s circumstances but also on their tax residence. In some cases, a change of tax residence can produce savings that dwarf the cost of the move — though such moves must be genuine and sustained to withstand tax authority scrutiny.

Practical planning considerations

Start early. Tax-efficient business transfers require years of planning. The requirements for the 95% reduction — particularly the Wealth Tax exemption — must be satisfied in advance of the transfer.

Get specialist advice. This is not a task for a general accountant. Specialist tax counsel with experience in family business transfers is essential.

Consider the family dynamics. Tax optimisation is important, but it should not override family harmony. A transfer structure that minimises tax but creates conflict among siblings may prove far more costly in the long run.

Document everything. The tax authorities regularly challenge family business transfer claims. Comprehensive documentation of the economic activity, management functions, and income levels is the best defence.

Conclusion

The choice between gift and inheritance for a family business transfer is not straightforward. It depends on the family’s specific circumstances, the autonomous community of residence, the corporate structure, and the family’s objectives. What is clear is that the decision should be made deliberately, with professional advice, and well in advance. The cost of improvisation — in taxes, in family relationships, and in business continuity — is simply too high.

Share this article

At your disposal

If you wish to explore a potential collaboration or present an investment opportunity, we invite you to contact us. We guarantee absolute confidentiality in all our conversations.