Capital from an entrepreneurial family behaves fundamentally differently from institutional capital. That difference, far from being a weakness, is its greatest strength in the middle market.
There is a question I receive in nearly every conversation with entrepreneurs: “Where does your money come from?” It is a legitimate and revealing question. The business owner wants to know whether they are talking to someone under external pressure — LPs demanding returns, committees imposing timelines, institutional investors needing liquidity — or to someone whose capital has a different nature.
At Blue Mountain, the capital is family capital. And that simple distinction changes everything.
A private equity fund raises money from third parties: pension funds, insurance companies, university endowments, sovereign wealth funds, and, ironically, family offices. These third parties are the Limited Partners (LPs). The fund manager — the General Partner (GP) — charges two types of fees: a management fee (typically 2% of committed capital annually) and a performance fee (carried interest, typically 20% of gains above a minimum threshold).
This structure creates incentives that, while perfectly rational from the GP’s perspective, do not always align with the interests of the entrepreneur selling their company.
The fund has a fixed lifecycle — typically ten years. The first three to five years are for investing. The next five to seven are for divesting. This means a clock is ticking from day one. If a transformation needs more time, there is no flexibility. If the exit market is unfavourable in year seven, the fund must sell regardless.
Family capital operates without those constraints. A family office invests its own wealth. There are no external LPs. No management fees forcing a minimum volume of assets under management. No fund lifecycle.
The practical implications are profound.
Flexible investment horizon. We can hold an investment for three years or for thirty. The decision depends solely on whether the company remains a good asset and whether there is a strategic reason to sell. We do not sell because “it is time.”
Aligned decisions. When we invest in a company, our own capital is at stake. This creates a natural alignment with the entrepreneur that is impossible to replicate with institutional structures.
Tolerance for complexity. The most interesting middle-market deals tend to be the most complex: family successions with multiple heirs, operational restructurings that need time, business transformations that carry short-term risk. Institutional capital tends to avoid this complexity because it does not fit their risk-adjusted return models. Family capital can embrace it because it has the patience to manage it.
With an institutional fund, the entrepreneur encounters a team of analysts who rotate every two to three years. The person who negotiated the deal probably will not manage the ongoing relationship. Quarterly reports are sent to a committee in London or New York. Strategic decisions are made based on the fund’s portfolio needs, not necessarily the individual company’s.
With a family investor, the entrepreneur deals with the same people from the first coffee to the last board meeting. Decisions are made based on what is best for the company, because what is best for the company is what is best for the investor. There is no agency conflict.
Family capital does have real limitations.
The first is scale. A family office can rarely compete with a large fund on ticket size. If a company needs 100 million euros in capital, we are probably not the right partner. Our natural territory is deals between 2 and 25 million euros.
The second is network. The large funds have international networks, value-creation teams with dozens of professionals, and relationships with global investment banks. A family office has a smaller network, though often deeper and more personal.
The third is governance. Family capital, by definition, concentrates decisions in few people. This is an advantage in agility but can be a risk if those people lack the right processes and discipline. A well-run family office mitigates this with advisory committees, formalised due diligence processes, and a culture of transparency. The entrepreneur should verify that these mechanisms exist.
The phenomenon of family offices as active middle-market investors is relatively recent in Spain but growing rapidly. Spain now has over 200 single-family offices and a growing number of multi-family offices with direct investment activity.
This growth follows a clear logic. Entrepreneurial families that sold their businesses over the past two decades need to reinvest that capital. Financial markets offer volatility and low real returns. Direct investment in middle-market companies offers superior returns and the satisfaction of remaining connected to the business fabric.
For the entrepreneur seeking a partner, this trend is good news. It means more family capital is available, more professionalised, and more experienced than ever.
At Blue Mountain, we believe family capital is the most natural way to invest in the Spanish middle market — not because it is abstractly superior to institutional capital, but because it adapts better to this market’s characteristics: family businesses, trust-based relationships, processes that need time, and deals where the human element matters as much as the financial one.
Dirk Manuel Martens Jimenez Founder, Blue Mountain Capital
Founder of Blue Mountain
Over 15 years investing in Spanish companies with patient capital. Expert in business succession, corporate governance, and middle-market investment.
By Blue Mountain Capital
By Dirk Manuel Martens Jiménez
By Dirk Manuel Martens Jiménez
If you wish to explore a potential collaboration or present an investment opportunity, we invite you to contact us. We guarantee absolute confidentiality in all our conversations.