A company whose primary activity is owning and managing stakes in other businesses, enabling centralised control, tax planning, and group-level strategic management.
Behind almost every business group sits a company that manufactures nothing, sells nothing, and delivers no service to end customers. Its function is to own the shares of the companies that do all of those things. This is the holding company — the apex of the corporate structure — and understanding how it works is essential for any mid-market M&A transaction.
A holding company is a legal entity whose principal activity is owning stakes in other companies. It does not carry on a business of its own in the operational sense: its business is being the owner of other businesses.
A holding can be structured in different ways:
Centralisation of control. In a group with multiple businesses, the holding allows the owner or family to control all subsidiaries from a single point. Instead of managing dispersed stakes in multiple entities, all ownership is concentrated in the holding.
Tax efficiency. Participation exemption regimes in most European jurisdictions allow dividends and capital gains flowing from subsidiaries to the holding to be exempt from taxation, provided certain requirements are met (typically a minimum ownership threshold held for a minimum period). This avoids double taxation and allows profits to be reinvested without a tax cost at the holding level.
Succession planning. The holding simplifies family succession. Instead of distributing direct stakes in each subsidiary among heirs (fragmenting control), shares in the holding are distributed — and the holding, in turn, controls all the businesses. This simplifies the transfer and preserves group unity.
Risk isolation. Each subsidiary is an independent legal entity. If one subsidiary encounters difficulties, the holding and the other subsidiaries are in principle protected (except in cases of piercing the corporate veil or group liability). This allows business risks to be taken within one subsidiary without jeopardising the broader group’s assets.
Centralised financing. The holding can act as the group’s central treasury: raising bank financing on better terms (leveraging the group’s consolidated size) and distributing it to subsidiaries according to their needs.
In the context of a transaction, the holding structure has direct implications:
Buying holding shares vs. subsidiary shares. When Blue Mountain wants to acquire a business that forms part of a group, it must decide at which level to buy. Purchasing the holding may provide access to multiple businesses simultaneously, but it also brings all the assets and liabilities of the entire structure. Buying the subsidiary directly is cleaner but may be complicated by centralised services, intercompany contracts, or cross-guarantees.
Group due diligence. When the target sits below a holding, due diligence must extend to related-party transactions between the holding and the subsidiary: management contracts, intercompany loans, cash pooling, allocation of centralised costs. These intercompany flows can significantly distort the subsidiary’s normalised EBITDA.
Transfer pricing. Transactions between the holding and its subsidiaries must be conducted at arm’s length. If the holding charges subsidiaries for management services, financing, or brand usage, those charges must be reasonable and documented. Tax authorities pay close attention to these related-party transactions.
A business owner in south-eastern Spain controls three businesses: a logistics company (15 million in revenue), a cold storage operation (8 million), and a real estate company that owns the warehouses where the other two operate (assets valued at 6 million). All three are independent limited companies with shares held personally by the owner and spouse.
Before initiating a sale process, the tax advisor recommends creating a holding company to consolidate all three stakes. The process:
Blue Mountain negotiates the purchase of 80% of the holding. By buying at the holding level, it acquires all three businesses in a single transaction with a single SPA. The real estate subsidiary is carved out: the owner retains 100% (it exits the group before the transaction) and signs a long-term lease with the logistics and cold storage operations. Result: the owner keeps the real estate asset with guaranteed rental income, and Blue Mountain acquires the operations without the property burden.
When one or more of these conditions apply: the business owner has more than one company, wants to plan succession, wishes to reinvest profits from one activity into another without a tax cost, or needs to separate operational assets from real estate before a sale. The cost of establishing and maintaining a holding (accounting, corporate tax filing, annual accounts) is modest compared to the tax and planning advantages it offers.
Yes, the holding has its own legal personality and is subject to corporate tax. However, dividends and capital gains from subsidiaries in which it holds a qualifying stake (typically 5% or more for at least one year) are generally exempt under participation exemption rules. This is not a blanket tax exemption but the elimination of double taxation: profits have already been taxed in the subsidiary that generated them.
Yes, and it is a common approach in M&A transactions. Selling holding shares allows the entire group to be transferred in a single transaction. For the individual seller, capital gains taxation applies at the personal income tax level. Tax planning for the sale, including potential reinvestment relief, should be addressed with a tax advisor well in advance.
If you wish to explore a potential collaboration or present an investment opportunity, we invite you to contact us. We guarantee absolute confidentiality in all our conversations.