A clause that enables the majority shareholder to compel minority shareholders to sell their shares alongside theirs, on the same terms, to facilitate a 100% sale of the company.
Selling a company with multiple shareholders can stall if a minority shareholder refuses to sell. The drag-along right is the contractual mechanism that allows the majority shareholder to compel all other shareholders to sell their stakes alongside theirs, preventing a minority from blocking a transaction that benefits the group as a whole.
A drag-along is a clause included in the shareholders’ agreement that grants the majority shareholder (or a group of shareholders reaching a specified percentage of the capital) the right to oblige the remaining shareholders to sell their shares to a third-party buyer, on the same terms and at the same price per share that the majority has negotiated.
It is, in essence, the reverse of the tag-along. While the tag-along protects the minority by giving them the option to sell, the drag-along protects the majority by preventing a minority from blocking a sale.
Third-party offer. A buyer presents an offer for 100% of the company’s capital to the majority shareholder.
Activation of the right. The majority accepts the offer and notifies minority shareholders that they are exercising the drag-along, detailing the buyer, price, conditions, and timeline.
Obligation to sell. The minority shareholders are contractually obligated to transfer their shares to the buyer on the notified terms.
Joint closing. The transaction closes with the sale of 100% of the capital. All shareholders receive the same price per share.
For the majority shareholder, the drag-along is essential to guarantee the saleability of the company. Most buyers — particularly investment funds and multinationals — want to acquire 100% of the capital. Without a drag-along, a shareholder with a 5% stake could block a multi-million-euro deal.
For the buyer, the existence of a drag-along in the shareholders’ agreement signals that the transaction is executable. Without this clause, the buyer must negotiate individually with each shareholder, increasing complexity, costs, and the risk of deal failure.
For the minority shareholder, the drag-along is a significant restriction. It compels them to sell even if they prefer not to, and at a time that may not be optimal. This is why drag-along negotiations must include protections against abuse.
A fair drag-along is not an absolute right of the majority. It should include safeguards:
A food distribution company in Spain has three shareholders: the founder (60%), a venture capital fund (30%), and a key executive (10%). A European distribution group offers 40 million euros for 100% of the capital.
The founder and the fund (totalling 90%) want to accept the offer. The executive prefers to stay because they have a performance bonus tied to the next three years’ results.
The shareholders’ agreement includes a drag-along activatable by shareholders representing more than 75% of the capital. The founder and the fund trigger the clause. The executive is obligated to sell the 10% stake for 4 million euros (at the same price per share as the others). As compensation, the buyer offers them a three-year management contract.
M&A best practices recommend negotiating both clauses as a balanced system:
| Clause | Protects | Risk without it |
|---|---|---|
| Tag-along | Minority | Trapped with a new partner |
| Drag-along | Majority | Minority blocks the sale |
A well-designed shareholders’ agreement includes both clauses with thresholds and conditions that balance the interests of all shareholders.
No. A well-negotiated drag-along includes minimum protections: a floor price or reference multiple, the same conditions the majority receives, and the requirement that the offer comes from an independent third-party buyer acting in good faith.
If the clause is validly incorporated into the shareholders’ agreement, the minority is contractually bound. Non-compliance creates liability for damages. Some clauses include forced execution mechanisms or irrevocable powers of attorney granted in favour of the majority to sign on behalf of the minority.
When the majority (or a qualified percentage of the capital, usually 75%) accepts a purchase offer for 100% of the capital and needs to drag the remaining shareholders to complete the transaction. The activation threshold is one of the most heavily negotiated points in the agreement.
If you wish to explore a potential collaboration or present an investment opportunity, we invite you to contact us. We guarantee absolute confidentiality in all our conversations.