There are many ways to deploy capital. You can buy listed shares, fund units, bonds, or real estate. But when we speak of direct investment in the context of M&A, we mean something very specific: entering the equity of a real company, with real people, to influence its management and create value from the inside. It is the most demanding form of investment — and, for those who practise it with discipline, the most rewarding.
What is direct investment
Direct investment is the acquisition of a stake large enough in a company’s equity to exercise effective influence over its strategic and management decisions. It differs from portfolio investment (buying a small parcel of listed shares) in that the direct investor is not a passive observer waiting for the price to rise: they are an active partner working alongside the management team to improve the business.
In mid-market practice, direct investment can take several forms:
- Majority acquisition (>50%). The investor takes effective control of the company. They can appoint the majority of the board and have the capacity to make strategic decisions unilaterally (subject to the shareholders’ agreement).
- Significant minority (25-50%). The investor holds a blocking stake and can influence strategic decisions through veto rights negotiated in the shareholders’ agreement, though they do not control the company alone.
- Co-investment. Multiple investors acquire stakes simultaneously. This is common in larger transactions where a single investor does not wish to assume the full equity commitment.
Direct investment vs. investment through funds
The fundamental difference lies in who makes the decisions:
Investment through funds. The investor contributes capital to a PE or VC fund. The fund manager decides which companies to invest in, how much to pay, how to intervene in management, and when to sell. The investor has no control over individual decisions — they trust the manager’s judgement.
Direct investment. The investor personally decides which company to invest in, negotiates the terms, sits on the board, and participates in management decisions. Knowledge of the business is first-hand, not filtered through intermediaries.
For a family office like Blue Mountain, direct investment is the natural approach. Our model is not about managing third-party capital and collecting fees — it is about deploying our own capital into companies we understand, with the commitment of time and resources needed to create sustainable value.
What a direct investor brings
A good direct investor does not only contribute capital. They bring:
Management discipline. Implementation of professional financial reporting, management dashboards, KPIs, budgets, and variance tracking. Many mid-market companies operate blind from a management control perspective — the founder carries the business “in their head” but not in a system.
Network. Access to customers, suppliers, experienced executives, advisors, and potential partners that the business owner could not reach alone.
Sector and transactional experience. Knowledge of best practices, sector benchmarks, proven growth strategies, and experience in complementary acquisitions (build-ups).
Ability to attract talent. A company backed by a professional investor can attract senior executives who would not consider joining a family SME with no growth horizon.
Strategic perspective. The ability to think and plan on a five-to-ten-year horizon, when the business owner may be consumed by day-to-day urgencies.
What direct investment is not
It is worth clarifying what direct investment is not:
- It is not a loan. The investor becomes a shareholder, sharing the business risk and return. They do not receive interest and have no guarantee of repayment.
- It is not passive investment. You do not buy a stake to sit and wait for it to appreciate. You invest to intervene actively.
- It is not a trading position. Direct investment has a medium-to-long-term horizon (three to ten years minimum). You do not buy today to sell tomorrow.
A practical example
Blue Mountain invests directly in an industrial cleaning services company in eastern Spain: 12 million in revenue, EBITDA of 1.8 million, 120 employees. The founder, aged 62, wants to gradually reduce his involvement but does not wish to sell 100%.
The direct investment structure:
- Blue Mountain acquires 60% of the shares for 7.2 million euros.
- The founder retains 40% and remains as board chairman with commercial responsibilities.
- Blue Mountain appoints an external CEO with industry experience.
- A five-year strategic plan is established: professionalise management, expand to two new regions, acquire a complementary industrial maintenance company.
By year three, the company generates revenue of 20 million with EBITDA of 3.5 million. The founder exercises his put option on the remaining 40% at a price determined by independent valuation. Blue Mountain takes 100% control of a transformed business worth significantly more than the total investment.
Frequently asked questions
What is the minimum capital a direct investor needs?
In the mid-market, direct investment transactions typically require an equity ticket of between 3 and 20 million euros (plus acquisition debt, if applicable). For smaller investments (below 2 million), transaction costs (advisors, due diligence, lawyers) make the deal less efficient. A micro-transaction segment exists below 1 million, where business angels and small private investors operate.
What return does a direct investor expect?
It depends on the risk profile and time horizon. A family office with a long horizon may target an IRR of 12-18% per annum, combining both the appreciation of the stake and dividends received during the holding period. A PE fund typically aims for IRRs of 20-25% to justify the risk and illiquidity of the investment.
Can I receive direct investment without losing control of my company?
Yes, if the stake sold is a minority and the shareholders’ agreement is well negotiated. However, any professional investor providing significant capital will want veto rights over critical decisions, board representation, and access to detailed financial information. You will not lose day-to-day operational control, but you will no longer make strategic decisions alone — and that, properly understood, is usually positive for the business.
Related articles